• Our Team
  • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Support Us
  • Donate

The Dark Side of Circumcision: Why the Media Needs to Speak Up

Let’s get one thing straight: Circumcision isn’t just a “harmless little snip.” It’s a brutal practice that robs babies of their right to bodily autonomy and leaves a trail of trauma and regret in its wake. But you wouldn’t know that from the media, which has sold us a fairytale of health benefits and cultural norms while glossing over the real damage being done.

Georganne Chapin doesn’t mince words in This Penis Business: A Memoir—circumcision is “a cruel, unnecessary act disguised as care.” Marilyn Milos’ Please Don’t Cut the Baby! A Nurse’s Memoir goes further, slamming it as a violation of the most basic human rights.

And they’re not alone. Parents, activists, and survivors are speaking out, begging us to see what’s really going on.

 

I. Media’s Role in This Mass Deception

 

Mainstream media has become the ultimate accomplice in this act of violence. Instead of shining a spotlight on the irreversible harm circumcision causes, they push a sanitized narrative. The media paints circumcision as just another normal part of life, something that good, responsible parents do for their children’s “health and hygiene.” It’s a classic bait-and-switch: sell the public on “protection” while ignoring the blood, the trauma, and the scars—both physical and psychological—that last a lifetime.

A study published in Public Health Reviews (2013) examined how the media represents circumcision. It found that media coverage often reinforces circumcision as a cultural norm, emphasizing supposed health benefits while rarely discussing the associated risks or ethical concerns. The study argued that media narratives frequently ignore voices critical of circumcision, effectively marginalizing dissenting opinions and promoting a biased, one-sided view.

 

II. Real Stories, Real Pain

 

Take Curtis from Worcestershire, who spoke in Caroline Lowbridge’s article, about the nightmare of his circumcision at age 7. “I’m scared of my own penis,” he says, recounting the infection that left him in agony and the years of sex therapy that still haven’t eased his trauma. Or listen to the testimony of countless others who were cut without consent, growing up with anxiety, PTSD, and damaged sexuality—all for a practice that does more harm than good.

And let’s talk about the numbers: A staggering 80.5% of American males have been circumcised, often without any real choice or understanding of the consequences (CDC). And what do they get for it? A lifetime of potential complications and regrets, while the media plays cheerleader to the status quo.

When we say ‘yes’ to circumcision, we say ‘no’ to bodily autonomy, to the right of the child to decide what happens to his own body. Chapin highlights the ethical issue of consent, underscoring that circumcision violates the basic right to bodily autonomy and self-determination.

 

III. The Unseen Risks and the Myth of Protection

 

Proponents of circumcision love to cite dubious “health benefits.” They’ll tell you it prevents everything from HIV to… well, whatever fits the narrative. But history has shown us the real story: circumcision was once touted as a cure for everything from epilepsy to masturbation. And now? The same recycled garbage is being peddled to a new generation.

Despite the grand claims, evidence shows circumcision isn’t some magic bullet for preventing HIV. Studies reveal the opposite: a false sense of security that leads to riskier behaviors. It’s like handing out life jackets with holes in them—looks safe, but it’s not saving anyone.

“The scars of circumcision are not just physical; they run deep into the psyche, affecting men in ways we are only beginning to understand.” – Marilyn Milos

Circumcision is not without physical risks. According to a comprehensive review by the Canadian Paediatric Society (2015), complications from circumcision occur in 1-5% of cases, ranging from minor issues like bleeding and infection to more severe problems such as injury to the penis, urethral damage, and, in rare cases, death. This contradicts the media portrayal of circumcision as a risk-free procedure, highlighting a lack of informed consent from parents who are unaware of these risks.

 

IV. Social Media: The New Battlefield

 

While traditional media keeps pushing the party line, social media has become a powerful weapon in the hands of those who know the truth. Platforms like YouTube are flooded with videos showing the brutal reality of circumcision, from the anguished cries of infants to testimonies from those who still bear the scars, both visible and invisible.

In 2023, Barry, Murray, Kravvas, Bunker, and Watchorn conducted a cross-sectional analysis of male circumcision videos on YouTube in order to reveal how this practice is portrayed on social media platforms. A whopping 82% presented a neutral or positive view, mainly from healthcare providers. But it’s the 12%—the hard-hitting, anti-circumcision voices—that are turning the tide, exposing the practice for what it really is: genital mutilation.

 

V. The Raw Reality: We Need to Talk About This

 

It’s time to stop hiding behind cultural and religious excuses. Circumcision is a human rights issue, plain and simple. When you strip away the euphemisms, the justifications, and the centuries of tradition, what’s left is a barbaric act that has no place in a civilized society.

Male circumcision isn’t just a “procedure”—it’s a form of assault that’s been normalized for far too long. And the media, with its biased portrayals and lack of honest discussion, is complicit. We need to demand better, louder, and more truthful coverage. The voices of those who have suffered should be front and center, not buried in the footnotes of history.

 

VI. Conclusion

 

The fight against circumcision is a battle for human rights, autonomy, and truth. The media has the power to change public perception, but only if it chooses to stop pandering to outdated norms and start telling the real story. This isn’t just about circumcision—it’s about every child’s right to a whole, unaltered body. And it’s time we all start acting like it.

Join the fight today because what’s yours should always remain yours.

Author

No Comments

Post a Comment

Marilyn

Marilyn Fayre Milos, multiple award winner for her humanitarian work to end routine infant circumcision in the United States and advocating for the rights of infants and children to genital autonomy, has written a warm and compelling memoir of her path to becoming “the founding mother of the intactivist movement.” Needing to support her family as a single mother in the early sixties, Milos taught banjo—having learned to play from Jerry Garcia (later of The Grateful Dead)—and worked as an assistant to comedian and social critic Lenny Bruce, typing out the content of his shows and transcribing court proceedings of his trials for obscenity. After Lenny’s death, she found her voice as an activist as part of the counterculture revolution, living in Haight Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1967 Summer of Love, and honed her organizational skills by creating an alternative education open classroom (still operating) in Marin County. 

After witnessing the pain and trauma of the circumcision of a newborn baby boy when she was a nursing student at Marin College, Milos learned everything she could about why infants were subjected to such brutal surgery. The more she read and discovered, the more convinced she became that circumcision had no medical benefits. As a nurse on the obstetrical unit at Marin General Hospital, she committed to making sure parents understood what circumcision entailed before signing a consent form. Considered an agitator and forced to resign in 1985, she co-founded NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers) and began organizing international symposia on circumcision, genital autonomy, and human rights. Milos edited and published the proceedings from the above-mentioned symposia and has written numerous articles in her quest to end circumcision and protect children’s bodily integrity. She currently serves on the board of directors of Intact America.

Georganne

Georganne Chapin is a healthcare expert, attorney, social justice advocate, and founding executive director of Intact America, the nation’s most influential organization opposing the U.S. medical industry’s penchant for surgically altering the genitals of male children (“circumcision”). Under her leadership, Intact America has definitively documented tactics used by U.S. doctors and healthcare facilities to pathologize the male foreskin, pressure parents into circumcising their sons, and forcibly retract the foreskins of intact boys, creating potentially lifelong, iatrogenic harm. 

Chapin holds a BA in Anthropology from Barnard College, and a Master’s degree in Sociomedical Sciences from Columbia University. For 25 years, she served as president and chief executive officer of Hudson Health Plan, a nonprofit Medicaid insurer in New York’s Hudson Valley. Mid-career, she enrolled in an evening law program, where she explored the legal and ethical issues underlying routine male circumcision, a subject that had interested her since witnessing the aftermath of the surgery conducted on her younger brother. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Pace University School of Law in 2003, and was subsequently admitted to the New York Bar. As an adjunct professor, she taught Bioethics and Medicaid and Disability Law at Pace, and Bioethics in Dominican College’s doctoral program for advanced practice nurses.

In 2004, Chapin founded the nonprofit Hudson Center for Health Equity and Quality, a company that designs software and provides consulting services designed to reduce administrative complexities, streamline and integrate data collection and reporting, and enhance access to care for those in need. In 2008, she co-founded Intact America.

Chapin has published many articles and op-ed essays, and has been interviewed on local, national and international television, radio and podcasts about ways the U.S. healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s basic needs. She cites routine (nontherapeutic) infant circumcision as a prime example of a practice that wastes money and harms boys and the men they will become. This Penis Business: A Memoir is her first book.